Brexit -am I stupid or what

Erm, could they not take it to the ECJ, just for kicks?

 

They already sought advice, and tried to get them involved, but the EU realised that it would be a bad move as it would confirm the truth.

 

Good evening how many judges and who are they who sit on this supreme court,can anyone tell me .Thank you

 

Naah, I wouldn't worry about that, loli, with our MP'S and interested, well funded, anti-BREXIT organisations. being well below the IQ of a dead chicken it kind of nullifies any questioning of the Queen's intelligence or those who voted OUT.

 

Actually Loofah, I did think about that and they, technically, could, but the ECJ would want to sit over an appeal of that nature as much as they would want to catch a Social Disease. But we are in very strange, unprecedented country and have been since the MP Remainers started to resorted to passing legislation against the BREXIT MP's.

 

Well, I should imagine she saw that coming and sought some advice, but I think she is very much her own woman and would have approved the proroguing quite happily. The last time a King or Queen refused a Prime Minister was back in Queen Victoria's reign so, unless there are extreme circumstances she/he is expected to agree to a request.

No, I tried that, pete, but Prince Phillip told me to %!$£!! off.

 

I think, KFF, that clanless, being an ardent LEAVER, is referring to those Conservative MPs who voted against the Government.

 

The idea was to limit the MP's debating time down to 17 days giving them less chance to agree to more plots and legislation designed to stop BREXIT. The trouble is that the only thing that the MP' can agree on is that they hate Boris and any idea of BREXIT even though some of them profess to want a BREXIT with a good deal.

 

People would interpret that as they are being pressured to leave on their own accord or they will be put on the "Boat" anyway.

Well. I don't think it's a case of "their problem" as it's everyone's problem. but the only change is they will need their own UK Passport and that should be it, unless the EU puts up pointless paperwork walls.
Also what is the UK isolating itself from? It merely wants to leave the EU Club and trade openly and without restrictions and independently globally, it will still trade with the European Countries under the control of the EU, people from the EU and the UK just need to use Passports and, yes, there will be some delays but that would be
worth it. I can understand why individuals will be concerned how BREXIT will effect them privately, but BREXIT is a National project on which the national freedom, trading, and political independence goes beyond an individual's desire to travel into European countries without a Passport.

 

No, you're right, pete, it hasn't worked, and they are united to keep legislating internally but the point is that "they" still can't agree amongst themselves on a plan for a deal for BREXIT and so it's going to be hard for the EU to think there would be any gain in an extension request.
Also, pete, all the numerous law suits against the Government are not by Political Parties but privately by people who are backed by financial anti-BREXIT organisations.

I think it's wrong to criticise Boris for using any method he can to get to BREXIT especially as he is quite aware of the fanatical opposition he faces. Would you or anyone else picked up the "Poisoned Chalice" and be doing better??. Hunt would have followed the rules and submitted to everything and we would not have to where we are now even though you seem to think that is nowhere whereas Boris is trying to find a way, in any way he can. You say he got peoples backs up. well, he did that as soon as he became Prime Minister

But nothing has in reality changed as they're still as divided as they were before over finding or approving a plan.