Separate Moan Thread About The Election

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by shiney, Jun 22, 2024.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BB3

    BB3 Gardener

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2024
    Messages:
    885
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    A bit of gardening
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +1,642
    How about a small additional percentage of tax? Each year, you get a list like a voting slip and you tick off 3+/- items on which you wish this tax to be spent
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Jack McHammocklashing

      Jack McHammocklashing Sludgemariner

      Joined:
      May 29, 2011
      Messages:
      4,425
      Gender:
      Male
      Occupation:
      Ex Civil Serpent
      Location:
      Fife Scotland
      Ratings:
      +7,383
      If they stopped the Twenty cigarettes a day they would not need them either
      Trouble with food banks is they are free, and when it is free some people jump on the wagon
      The note from a Dr or carer for just three visits, is utter rubbish, they go three or four times a week
       
    • Erigeron

      Erigeron Gardener

      Joined:
      Mar 13, 2024
      Messages:
      73
      Gender:
      Male
      Ratings:
      +164
      The difference is that Labour have never pretended to be a low-tax party, the tories make a big thing of it and yet taxes have gone up and up while they've been in power.

      But yes, its going to be a massive challenge for an incoming government that's for sure. They are going to have to upset a lot of people in order to achieve any real change. And anything they're planning could become irrelevant if some major unexpected international crisis were to unfold (like it did in Blair's tenure with 9/11).
       
      • Like Like x 2
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • Erigeron

        Erigeron Gardener

        Joined:
        Mar 13, 2024
        Messages:
        73
        Gender:
        Male
        Ratings:
        +164
        Yeah I definitely didn't like them being endorsed by Rupert Murdoch.

        I just hope they're smart enough to make things that may be unpopular sound like worthwhile sacrifices. Thats why they use spin doctors rather than throwing words like "nationalisation" around (which turns a lot of people off).

        I can't imagine the Blair government's national minimum wage, smoking ban or devolution were initially popular with the moneyed elite, but some people are very persuasive and manage to make a good case.
         
        • Agree Agree x 1
        • JWK

          JWK Gardener Staff Member

          Joined:
          Jun 3, 2008
          Messages:
          32,615
          Gender:
          Male
          Location:
          Surrey
          Ratings:
          +50,460
          I understand what you are getting at but that is factually incorrect, companies can only pay dividends from profits not borrowed money.

          I agree it is a scandal that such a vital public service has been treated as a cash cow by foreign owners.
           
          • Agree Agree x 1
          • shiney

            shiney President, Grumpy Old Men's Club Staff Member

            Joined:
            Jul 3, 2006
            Messages:
            63,872
            Gender:
            Male
            Occupation:
            Retired - Last Century!!!
            Location:
            Herts/Essex border. Zone 8b
            Ratings:
            +124,741
            I'm still trying to decide what to give my millions to. :scratch:
             
            • Funny Funny x 1
            • simone_in_wiltshire

              simone_in_wiltshire Keen Gardener

              Joined:
              Mar 16, 2024
              Messages:
              956
              Gender:
              Female
              Location:
              NE Wiltshire, UK
              Ratings:
              +4,315
              The big advantage of the UK’s “The first pasts the post” is that we commonly end up with a 1 party government. If that would be changed, it would be devastating. These multi-parties coalitions in Europe don’t get a foot on the ground.
              Labour didn’t really say upfront what they plan to do, which is normally a sign of “if I tell them the truth, we will not be elected”. Topics like finances that have an impact on the entire country or over a longer period of time are always shared between the parties. At least we can give Reeves credit that she is not trying to lie, when she said yesterday there isn’t much money left. In Germany they would say, “we had a look into the books and much to our surprise, it’s worse than we anticipated and we can’t change anything but increase taxes”
              I remember when Cameron took over in 2015 that there was no money left at all, and how upset people were with Osbourn and the LibDems. It’s in the nature of left governments that they have no interests in saving money, and so I wonder if the higher taxes that we will have to pay are used for limiting the national debts or are thrown out of the windows to feed Labour cronies and wokery. I wonder how many committees, commissions with quality experts they need to tell us that they have found out that they can't change anything but have to make even more debts.

              @ViewAhead Sewage is a world-wide issue. The main reason is not that water companies use profits to pay dividends rather than building bigger sewage clearance systems but the failed idea of collecting all water including rain water that comes down onto sealed surfaces (pavement, roads, buildings) which happens in towns where here e.g. 80% of the population lives. Solving that requires a completely new approach and requires a change in infrastructure.
              Building "wed meadows" in sealed towns that collect the roof water seems to be the current way out.
               
              • Like Like x 5
                Last edited: Jul 6, 2024
              • ViewAhead

                ViewAhead Head Gardener

                Joined:
                Mar 14, 2024
                Messages:
                2,080
                Gender:
                Female
                Location:
                South of the South Downs, north of the sea!
                Ratings:
                +4,521
                I'm not sure of the exact details (Ian Hislop could tell you as he ran through what had happened on one episode of HIGNFY), but somehow the water companies borrowed money to go on infrastructure, did not use it for infrastructure, but at the same time managed generous dividends for shareholders. It may have been some sleight of hand over how they defined "profits". The upshot is shareholders have gained and users have lost out and the companies are now in huge debt and consumers' bills will rise as shareholders have declined to invest extra.
                 
                • Like Like x 2
                • ViewAhead

                  ViewAhead Head Gardener

                  Joined:
                  Mar 14, 2024
                  Messages:
                  2,080
                  Gender:
                  Female
                  Location:
                  South of the South Downs, north of the sea!
                  Ratings:
                  +4,521
                  Yes, you are probably right.

                  The philantrocapitalism model so beloved by the elite left (Bill Gates et al) enables the very wealthy to decide what their money goes on ... and make huge profits in the process of then providing that service through their own companies or investments in certain areas and getting tax relief on their "donations". A voluntary wealth tax would mean the money could be used instead on things the gov chose, which is how funds should be spent in a democracy. With a voluntary wealth tax, I just thought giving them an element of choice might make it more palatable. Obviously they would not profit financially from their donation, as they wouldn't be able to choose something that they then provided, charging the gov for doing so.
                   
                • gks

                  gks Total Gardener

                  Joined:
                  Feb 28, 2021
                  Messages:
                  1,750
                  Gender:
                  Male
                  Occupation:
                  Production Manager
                  Location:
                  Cumbria
                  Ratings:
                  +5,033
                  Do you have your own currency? :biggrin:

                  min.jpg
                   
                  • Funny Funny x 6
                  • Loofah

                    Loofah Admin Staff Member

                    Joined:
                    Feb 20, 2008
                    Messages:
                    14,162
                    Gender:
                    Male
                    Location:
                    Guildford
                    Ratings:
                    +24,810
                    I think they did and they don't plan to change the system.
                    Farage is dead set on it though so expect him to bore you to tears on changing how we vote
                     
                    • Agree Agree x 3
                    • Funny Funny x 3
                    • Like Like x 1
                    • simone_in_wiltshire

                      simone_in_wiltshire Keen Gardener

                      Joined:
                      Mar 16, 2024
                      Messages:
                      956
                      Gender:
                      Female
                      Location:
                      NE Wiltshire, UK
                      Ratings:
                      +4,315
                      They haven’t. There will be more to come.
                       
                      • Agree Agree x 1
                      • pete

                        pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

                        Joined:
                        Jan 9, 2005
                        Messages:
                        51,571
                        Gender:
                        Male
                        Occupation:
                        Retired
                        Location:
                        Mid Kent
                        Ratings:
                        +95,477
                        And me.:biggrin:

                        Maybe other systems don't work, but this one definitely doesn't, there has to be one that's a bit more democratic than this archaic one we are stuck with. :smile:
                        I'll say no more, promise.
                         
                        • Agree Agree x 2
                        • cactus_girl

                          cactus_girl Super Gardener

                          Joined:
                          Mar 15, 2024
                          Messages:
                          755
                          Gender:
                          Female
                          Occupation:
                          Retired
                          Location:
                          Sutton Coldfield
                          Ratings:
                          +2,927
                          So 4 out of 5 people did not vote Labour?
                           
                          • Agree Agree x 3
                          • JWK

                            JWK Gardener Staff Member

                            Joined:
                            Jun 3, 2008
                            Messages:
                            32,615
                            Gender:
                            Male
                            Location:
                            Surrey
                            Ratings:
                            +50,460
                            With creative accounting they probably are sailing close to the wind. Lots of borrowed money being poured in at one end with huge dividends and salaries being taken out at the other whilst not enough investment in infrastructure doesn't stack up. Thames Water is close to bankruptcy so something very fishy is going on. Unfortunately us taxpayers will have to bail that company out if it does go bust, they can't lose.

                            The water companies should never had been privatised in my view but then again the waste and inefficiencies of government run services were just as bad.
                             
                            • Agree Agree x 2
                            Loading...
                            Thread Status:
                            Not open for further replies.

                            Share This Page

                            1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
                              By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
                              Dismiss Notice