Why would anyone join the armed forces?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by clueless1, Nov 15, 2013.

  1. ARMANDII

    ARMANDII Low Flying Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2019
    Messages:
    48,096
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +100,838
    Hi Billybell,
    The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders were great troops and fighters [the latter especially in Bars and Pubs:snork:] and had the respect of us all. You're right, they had enough experience and "independence" to "react" faster and with less restriction. Plus you will remember the Crater incident where Lieutenant Colonel "Mad Mitch" Colin Campbell Mitchell led the Argylls into Crater, against orders, to rescue the mobile patrols being ambushed and overwhelmed. I was actually on the roof of the Red Sea Hotel, Mahla, watching an armoured car shooting at some rebel machine gun nests controlling a road into Crater and clearing them so that the "boys" could drive in there and sort things out.


    The Cameronians [Scottish Rifles] had the same reputation.!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • clueless1

      clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

      Joined:
      Jan 8, 2008
      Messages:
      17,778
      Gender:
      Male
      Location:
      Here
      Ratings:
      +19,596
      I wish I could mount a massive counter to this, but I can't because I know you're right. Its like WW2 and the politics leading to it. "Lest we forget" is something I've heard/seen written many times at services and the funerals of my grandads and such. I think it's trying to say we should 'remember' what happened so we can spot the signs and make sure it doesn't happen again. By 'remember', obviously I mean 'learn/understand' because I can't remember it, I wasn't even born, but I speak to people younger than me, people who are young enough such that they didn't have grandparents that lived it to tell them about it etc, and some of their ideas are worryingly fascist. We already saw it happen again, albeit not quite on the same scale, when Yugoslavia fell apart, and indeed when many of the former Soviets started to fall out.

      Yes, my grandad, my dad, me, and my oldest son. We are just younger exact copies of each other.
       
      • Like Like x 3
      • Billybell

        Billybell Gardener

        Joined:
        Oct 24, 2013
        Messages:
        131
        Gender:
        Male
        Occupation:
        Retired and spending my kids inheritence.
        Location:
        West Yorks
        Ratings:
        +532
        If I remember correctly the Arabs thought that the Argylls came from a wild hill tribe, (not far wrong)
         
      • Loofah

        Loofah Admin Staff Member

        Joined:
        Feb 20, 2008
        Messages:
        13,651
        Gender:
        Male
        Location:
        Guildford
        Ratings:
        +23,872
        I was RN. You join and you do. It's an honour and a privilege and those that serve get rewarded with skills and experiences that are life-changing. People at home have no real desire to see or hear about what actually happens. This story is a political play but triggered through one marine who did something wrong stupid - filming himself executing a man and admitting he knew he was breaking the convention. He dropped the standard that is held very high.
         
        • Agree Agree x 5
        • Like Like x 1
        • Informative Informative x 1
        • Jack McHammocklashing

          Jack McHammocklashing Sludgemariner

          Joined:
          May 29, 2011
          Messages:
          4,416
          Gender:
          Male
          Occupation:
          Ex Civil Serpent
          Location:
          Fife Scotland
          Ratings:
          +7,347
          Excellent replies, from Armandii, Loofah, Billy Bell and others

          To clueless it is a lot different now, but when you joined up in the 50's/early 60's
          You had two options, sign the dotted line for Nine years, or for a higher rate of pay
          Twentytwo years,
          On day one you were asked were you willing, and if not you can stand up in front of the other
          50 new entries, walk to the front and get a railway warrant home, Then one week later, you could say I can not take this
          That was your last chance, come hell or high water there was no going back, 22 years it was
          (Unless you were very bad, then you went to The Toughest Jail in the World for eighteen months, and then were kicked out with nothing, and an exceptionally bad CV on Linen paper that you could not hide (explain to an employer where you have been for twelve years)

          In the very early 70's it was deemed a bit unfair (and the Government were wanting to cut staff)
          it was stated that you could give eighteen months notice, and pay back a years salary to leave early (Buy yourself out dependant on how much your job was no longer wanted

          Why join, too many different reasons as Armandii has stated
          Though the offer to travel the world FREE, and be paid, learn a damn good trade, retire with a good pension aged 40 with impeccable discipline and experience
          Live life to the full with 20 lads your same age, along with a further 36000 fellow servicemen
          Why not
          You do know that "you" never get killed or maimed one is immortal
          (There are actually worse things than death, or fighting in action, that some servicemen/women have to live with for the rest of their lives)

          I have only being in skirmishes, you do not think it will be you that gets killed, The ones that do get killed know nothing about it, the ones that are maimed use along with the other servicemen BLACK HUMOUR, Our Fire brigade people use the same black humour

          As I understand it now, you only have to commit for three years, again at a lower income, and the buy out is only one years notice and half a years salary pay back

          I have started to ramble, and rant,
          If I was young and fit enough I would go back tomorrow

          As for Marine "A" On the face of it it appears wrong,
          Put yourself in the position, of facing Taliban, (No uniforms to fight against, it could be the nice guy whose computer you have just fixed) every second of every day for six months, as
          you drive to work each day, you see bits of your best ever friend hanging in trees, or spiked on railings along the way (It is not like your best friend, it is the person you have spent six years living and breathing every second together)
          I think that would make you snap

          Again I think they were utter fools for filming it and keeping the information
          What happens on HMS BULWARK STAYS ON HMS BULWARK

          Jack McH
           
          • Informative Informative x 2
          • Like Like x 1
          • clueless1

            clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

            Joined:
            Jan 8, 2008
            Messages:
            17,778
            Gender:
            Male
            Location:
            Here
            Ratings:
            +19,596
            This is kind of my point. I don't think I would snap. I know I would snap. Maybe that's one of the reasons I never followed through when I was in the recruitment process, although I never thought of it like that at the time. I saw the news of the UN peacekeepers standing and watching (following orders not to intervene) while a village was trashed, mean summarily executed, women raped then killed, and kids, some toddlers, shot in the head, and I withdrew my application. I don't judge the soldiers that stood by following orders. If soldiers did their own thing, it would be chaos, but I judged 'the system' and decided I wanted no part of it. Possibly because I don't think I could have followed that order. I would probably have been the one that got my comrades into a lot of bother by doing my own thing (and dragging them into it by doing so). I don't understand why they were ordered such. Perhaps because the Russians never really approved of NATO/UN's presence in the first place, perhaps some other reason that I'll never have the info about that I'd need to understand, but whatever, I realised that I couldn't give myself 100% to that sort of system.

            The marine that's facing life in jail for killing his enemy, the enemy as defined by the people that put him in that situation, may have done wrong. But what I don't get is how he can be treated the same as a cold blooded murderer without any consideration at all for the circumstances. That's the system I can't understand. I know many people personally who are ex-services and they say pretty much the same as those of you on here that are ex-services have said, and it sounds fantastic about the camaraderie, opportunity etc, but right at the top, outside of the military and inside the politics that control the military, it just sounds to me like the military are treat as kind of a machine, a tool to be used, with no consideration at all for the fact that it is actually a collection of exceptionally good human beings.
             
          • ARMANDII

            ARMANDII Low Flying Administrator Staff Member

            Joined:
            Jan 12, 2019
            Messages:
            48,096
            Gender:
            Male
            Ratings:
            +100,838
            I don't think you quite understand, Clueless, that you became part of the system once you'd "judged the system" and withdrew the application. Standing on the sidelines and basically thinking "I couldn't follow this or that order so I don't want anything to do with it" doesn't absolve you, or anyone else for that matter, from the responsibility of either doing "something" or doing nothing.
            I think you have a kind of theoretical idea of what the Services should be doing, and what the Services can actually do, which doesn't match what happens in real/practical terms. Take for instance the UN Forces. Firstly, they are not part of the Regular Services. They were/are a politically improvised force led by a group of disagreeing and squabbling Countries each with their own agenda. They were/are under resourced, with no real firepower, and their Commanding Officers Masters were/are sitting in large comfortable Government offices in a different world. They were never given the ability/powers to intervene and if they had done so then on many occasions they would have been slaughtered by the warring elements because there was no back up political or military. Their purpose was, as in Cyprus, to be a buffer between the opposing forces. In the case of Cyprus the Turks just drove straight past them until they had gained all the territory they had planned to gain and the Greeks had stopped retreating. The two hostile groups basically decided where the border was and then the UN stuck flags up and symbolically stood between them.
            Nor were the UN troops given orders not to intervene because they didn't have to be. They were never armed enough or given the mandate to do so because they were never designed to be an aggressive intervening force. They were/are a Political force that has soldiers contributed from a lot of different countries and those countries are supposed to contribute enough finances to arm, supply and pay the wages of those troops, and that has caused many a UN Force to be withdrawn not because of the hostile forces but because the contributing countries haven't contributed financially as per their commitment. Also despite being in a so called organised force they were divided by the fact that every platoon, Company, Division was really under the Government control and political restrictions of the country they came from. Again, there were cases in Africa where the troops weren't even paid, had different weapons and very little ammunition never mind motive and support. Which is why I'm trying to emphasise the difference between the Regular Armed Forces and politically led organisations such as the UN.
            In the rif raf we were taught to think for ourselves. mainly because we were Tradesmen first and Arms Bearers second. We were also taught to obey the last order but not an illegal order.
            Having said that I know of no occasion, even when serving in Aden where daily shootings, bombings, hand grenade attacks etc were the norm, that anyone was given an order that wasn't justified, fair, and legal. But you have to understand that in combat circumstances Commanding Officers don't stand on top of the trenches shouting "Forward Men, kill them all". I think you have to be with a group of people wearing the same uniform as you. either in a patrol going through a Afghan village, or standing at a Check Point somewhere where it's dark having the snap of rounds going past you or the crack of a grenade or an RPG to understand that it's actually you that takes the decision to fire back. In a sense you're not in a system you're in a set of circumstances where you and your colleagues decide the outcome and how you react mentally, morally and the will to defend yourselves.
            The Services weren't perfect then and they aren't now and on the present trend of cuts and the growing dependence of a part time force and a decreasing core of professionals they are unlikely ever to be. But they are an "aggressive defensive" and effective force in spirit and weaponry who are put into military positions that the UN are not because the controlling Governments recognise that it has to be "WAR, WAR, BEFORE JAW, JAW" and that there is no place for a symbolic political force, such as the UN, that is not really even capable of defending itself.
             
            • Informative Informative x 2
            • Jack McHammocklashing

              Jack McHammocklashing Sludgemariner

              Joined:
              May 29, 2011
              Messages:
              4,416
              Gender:
              Male
              Occupation:
              Ex Civil Serpent
              Location:
              Fife Scotland
              Ratings:
              +7,347
              The toughest Jail in the world
              I do not know about the Rif Raf, the Royal Navy had RNDQ's (Royal Naval Detention Quarters)
              The Army had Colchester, which is now the joint services prison

              RNDQ's
              Awake at 05:00, lift mattress (every second in their is at the double ie Run fast lifting knees to chest) you then had to take the mattress down the stairs, and run around the parade ground (football field) ten times with the mattress shoulder high on your back
              You then doubled back to your cell, where you had to make up your bedding to inspection standards, and be immaculate in cleanliness both yourself and your cell
              You were then allowed to double to breakfast, weak tea no sugar, and porridge made with water no sugar, double back to your cell
              Stand outside your cell not crossing the Red Line doubling on the spot
              Then you had to scrub your cell out using a tooth brush and carbolic soap, polish an aluminium Spitkid ( a type of low rubbish bin) until is shone Watched and shouted at in your face by one of the Royal Naval Patrol
              When that was done you were given a six foot piece of Rope 4" diameter, and you had to shred it down to Oakum (sort of like lambs wool fibres)
              You did not actually get time off to yourself but you had to chain stich your name on every article of clothing (ie your full Naval Kit and in those days it was EVERYTHING socks pants vests, foul weather gear, all your different uniforms approximately six, Tropical, Western, Arctic, working dress, second dress and number one dress)
              If you smoked you were allowed one roll up per day not at the double but only six minutes
              Then you doubled to Dinner, weak soup, and crap meat, and a sponge pudding with water custard,
              Take your Rifle at the double and do another ten rounds of the parade ground with it held above your head
              More Oakum picking and so on until 22:00
              You were not allowed to speak to anyone else, and had to answer SIR to anyone of authority who was drilling you
              During the night your cell was opened every four hours, you had to get up and double on the spot, then after five minutes you could go back to sleep
              Every second of every day of your sentence
              It was normally 28 days for, going absent, or striking another rating, up to eighteen months before discharge for striking an officer or causing dissent amongst the ranks and in the later years ie 70's taking drugs)
              In my service I only came across Nine who had actually done it or in perspective one on each ship from say seven 28 days, who came back onboard after losing six stones and fit as hell and one never seen again (stole drugs from the ships dentist and took it all, it took eight of us to actually hold him down and get him into a holger neilson stretcher a sort of straight jacket)

              My own demons are pulling children out at Aberfan, (we were given loads of rum and spades)
              Nigeria in 68 skirmish shot and/or shoot

              Jack McHammocklashing
               
              • Informative Informative x 3
              • Like Like x 1
              • clueless1

                clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

                Joined:
                Jan 8, 2008
                Messages:
                17,778
                Gender:
                Male
                Location:
                Here
                Ratings:
                +19,596
                Maybe in my youthful naivety (at that time - I was only 18), I may have misinterpreted the many and varied signals that were coming in.

                At the time, I was joining up because the marketing promised me a good career in engineering, trained to the highest standards, unrivalled physical fitness, adventure, and the chance to make friends that were more than friends but more like family.

                Then war broke out with Yugoslavia breaking up and genocide happening, and my resolve was even stronger. I had visions of contributing positively to the prevention of innocent civilian slaughter.

                Then news came of the incident I referred to earlier, where UN Peace keepers were, as I recall it being reported (I don't know how the info may have been distorted somewhere between the front line and the news as it appeared on TV) that the peace keepers were told to do nothing but watch. As I said, the news may have been distorted, but it showed big guns and armoured vehicles and lots of soldiers with guns and modern gear, while the village was being ransacked by thugs, armed with nothing more than out dated former soviet light rifles.

                I was told during the recruitment process that I could be deployed in a number of ways, including in the blue uniform of a member of the peace keeping force.

                I didn't judge the system the system once I was part of it, unless you count being in the recruitment process prior to finalising everything as being in it, and if that is the case, I judged it once, decided I wanted to be in it, learned more and judged it again.

                I have the sense that you might think I'm judging the actual military people themselves. I'm not. I've always been proud of our military, and remain so. What I'm less proud of is all the political side of it. It is not the military that I fell out with when I withdrew my application, it is the political machine.

                I also get the sense that I'm being judged as someone who doesn't know what they're on about having never been in the military. I've never claimed that I was in the military or that I know what it is like to be in the military. My original question, based on observations as a civvy, was why would anyone, who like me, hasn't been in the military, want to join it now with the kind of stuff we see in the media.
                 
                • Like Like x 2
                • "M"

                  "M" Total Gardener

                  Joined:
                  Aug 11, 2012
                  Messages:
                  18,607
                  Location:
                  The Garden of England
                  Ratings:
                  +31,885
                  Is it possible to have one without the other?
                  I don't pick up that sense, clue: what I pick up is that your question is being answered by a number those who have military experience and therefore, insight (and their own reasons for joining) in order to give perspective to your question.
                  I wonder if you are overthinking this?

                  Clearly, you gave some weight to what was being portrayed in the media, at the time of your own application: you weighed up your options; you made a choice. That choice was right for you, at that time, given your circumstances and political views.

                  There are many young people in civvy street who may not give it such deep thought and their thoughts may well be much more immediate. Their choices may be far more simple: join the forces ... or the dole.

                  Politics are not foremost in young peoples minds: the voting figures are a reflection of that.

                  They may consider the potential for serious injury/death exist, but that age group generally see themselves as immortal and will (if they think about it in any depth at all) consider the percentage of seriously injured/killed vs the total population of the military and decide it is a small enough gamble. Especially when the alternative is serious injury/death by stagnation in civvy street where their options are so restricted and their self worth may be more at stake and considered of higher value?
                   
                  • Like Like x 1
                  • Agree Agree x 1
                  • Informative Informative x 1
                  • wiseowl

                    wiseowl Amiable Admin Staff Member

                    Joined:
                    Oct 29, 2006
                    Messages:
                    44,760
                    Gender:
                    Male
                    Occupation:
                    Philosophy of people
                    Location:
                    In a barn somewhere in North Kent
                    Ratings:
                    +91,673
                    Good morning I also served and would do again tomorrow if I was needed:)

                    It has been said that the Geneva Convention takes ‘barbarism out of war’. Yet war has always been a barbaric business and in the heat of battle all kinds of things inevitably go on, whether we like it or not, or perhaps more accurately whether we like to think it or not. ;)
                     
                    • Agree Agree x 2
                    • Informative Informative x 1
                    • clueless1

                      clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

                      Joined:
                      Jan 8, 2008
                      Messages:
                      17,778
                      Gender:
                      Male
                      Location:
                      Here
                      Ratings:
                      +19,596
                      @stumorphmac, your opinion is as valued by me as anyone else's.

                      Would you care to elaborate which bits you disagree with? Have I completely imagined the news items that I referred to? Or were you disagreeing with my point that the military personnel are all exceptional people? Or were you disagreeing because I said I wouldn't take a job on those terms?

                      On the next post you disagree on, I'm not sure which bit you're disagreeing with there either. Do you disagree that we are able to pass judgement from the comfort of our relatively safe homes, or that some people don't have the luxury?

                      Or did you simply hit the disagree button just because you disagree with me for raising the subject?

                      I mean no offence, but the disagree button can sometimes be a little bit too vague as a means of expressing an opinion. I was hoping to understand the situation better than I currently do, and many people have offered very insightful posts to that end. I'd love to read your opinion, but I can't guess it just from a little red icon alone.
                       
                    • "M"

                      "M" Total Gardener

                      Joined:
                      Aug 11, 2012
                      Messages:
                      18,607
                      Location:
                      The Garden of England
                      Ratings:
                      +31,885
                      And of that, I have no doubt :dbgrtmb:

                      Yet, I have a feeling that Our Mandy, Aye, meant something a little less obvious/inherited. :redface:

                      I recall my mother saying to me: "Live long enough, and you find yourself meeting the same people"

                      (How much did I dislike her mystic Meg 'sayings' :wallbanging: :scratch: :th scifD36: :stirpot: :nonofinger: :dunno: ) Right up until the point ... I recognised what she alluded to :ideaIPB: ! :wallbanging: )

                      It's not the same as inherited virtues/physic. It is beyond either, yet consistent ;)
                       
                      • Agree Agree x 1
                      • ARMANDII

                        ARMANDII Low Flying Administrator Staff Member

                        Joined:
                        Jan 12, 2019
                        Messages:
                        48,096
                        Gender:
                        Male
                        Ratings:
                        +100,838
                        Sorry Clueless, I posted a lengthy thread in reply to your and found only the first quote was printed:gaah:. I'll try again trying to keep the essence and bones of my original post.


                        Not so, Clueless. You were very clear that you were judging the system only.


                        Again not so, Clueless. What I was trying to express was that perhaps people who had served in the Armed Forces might be able to shed a different light and reality on the subject due to the enlightenment of being in the forces at the time.


                        To be honest, the last person you should have believed is the Recruiter in the Recruiting Office.
                        His job is to get as many people into uniform as reasonably possibly to prove himself to his superiors. While he might have seemed to have your personal career prospect at heart I assure you he did not, he was only looking after his!

                        Again I think the Recruiter was laying it on a bit thick as your chances of being pressed into the UN forces were extremely small as was our contribution.........but perhaps he was thinking it would sound attractive to some one fresh off the streets, glory of the uniform and all that Jazz and the way the UN at that time was presented to the Public by the Politicians while those in the Armed Forces knew the truth.


                        I guess that's in the back of the mind of anyone who signs up. But the Serbian/Croatian war
                        was given to the UN to solve not the regular Armed Forces. But again as I pointed out the UN forces were not designed to be a powerful intervening force and it was not politically united so all it could do was to finger wag and report any war crimes etc back to the UN. Regarding the genocide it was nothing new in that area as it's being going on for nearly 200 years. During WW11 the Serbians were persecuted and genocide committed by the Croatians and that inflamed the hatred and ethnic division right up to the present.
                        The meddling of the victors of WW1 and WW11 made the situation even worse by dividing countries and creating new ones which only threw petrol of the fire. The war may have ended but the hate and ethnic division is still there and while the original Leaders may have disappeared there are those who have replaced them with the same mind set. You have only to look at how long it took the Authorities to "capture" the War Criminals virtually giving the UN no help to do so while knowing exactly where those people were to know the same thinking is still there.

                        The UN never had "big guns and armoured vehicles and lots of soldiers with guns and modern gear" They were a symbolic political force driving around with no permission to be aggressive using force of arms. They were driving around in white painted vehicles [nice targets] from old WW11 stock such as the lightly armoured and armed Scout Cars, thin skinned trucks, Jeeps and Landrovers. They wore soft symbolic blue berets, their arms weren't even similar but differed from country to country depending on their choice of arms. They were again short on weapons, ammunition and the military ability to even intervene when a war crime was being committed in front of their eyes. The Danes are still smarting from the humiliation of standing by while the Croatians took 500 men and boys from a village that they were supposed to be in control of and having to watch knowing they were going to murder them. The Croatians on the other hand had a force of Russian Tanks, guns and armoured vehicles and while some of the militia had just AK47s they had the permission of their masters to use them while the UN did not. It was the regular Armed Forces [under the auspices of a much shamed and desparate UN] that stopped the war not the UN.
                         
                        • Like Like x 1
                        • Agree Agree x 1
                        • pete

                          pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

                          Joined:
                          Jan 9, 2005
                          Messages:
                          50,493
                          Gender:
                          Male
                          Occupation:
                          Retired
                          Location:
                          Mid Kent
                          Ratings:
                          +92,105
                          I can remember seeing the so called "Task Force" heading off to the South Atlantic in the early 80s, loads of young blokes all full of how we were going to knock the Argies for six.

                          They looked different on return somehow, even though we won.

                          When you are young you think you will live for ever, add a bunch of high ups, stirring national pride and telling you, you are the best in the world, and its no wonder youngsters join up.

                          Its only when they get posted to a war zone that reality clicks in.

                          I seem to remember all those old recruitment ads on the TV years ago.
                          "Join the army and see the world" etc.
                          No mention of coming home in a body bag.
                           
                          • Agree Agree x 2
                          • Informative Informative x 1
                          Loading...

                          Share This Page

                          1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
                            By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
                            Dismiss Notice