Herbicide in manure

Discussion in 'Compost, Fertilisers & Recycling' started by Labrador, Jul 10, 2008.

  1. Labrador

    Labrador Gardener

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    119
    Location:
    Norwich
    Ratings:
    +0
    I've been listening and reading that alot of manure people are using is being contaminated with a herbicide which is causing plants to just give up the ghost and wither away. Is this the cause of some of your threads about poor failing veg?
     
  2. JWK

    JWK Gardener Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    32,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +50,461
    I'd just like to point out to everyone that this is not just in Manure, I had the problem with bags of compost that are readiliy available in garden centres nationwide. I'm not the only one either, I also believe the few of us who have reported problems are the tip of the iceberg as many many people will not think its dodgy compost but rather blame the funny weather this year or other pests and diseases.

    Did you hear about the problems on Gardeners Question Time?

    Amazingly many allotmenteers/gardeners are still unaware, there are a few of us trying to get the National Press and Gardeners World to warn everyone but with little success so far.

    On our forum we have discussed it here: http://www.gardenerscorner.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=15248 and a little bit here as well: http://www.gardenerscorner.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=15387.

    There are many other forums talking about this (too many to list) but the best place to get a summary of the problem and keep up to date with our attempts to publicise this are here: http://www.glallotments.btik.com/p_Contaminated_Manure.ikml

    I'm pleased you have raised it again here as I'm not sure everyone visits each of our forum's sections.
     
  3. Labrador

    Labrador Gardener

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    119
    Location:
    Norwich
    Ratings:
    +0
  4. Kristen

    Kristen Under gardener

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    17,534
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Suffolk, UK
    Ratings:
    +12,669
    Excellent, well balanced, article
     
  5. tweaky

    tweaky Gardener

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,991
    Ratings:
    +3
    This should really be taken up in government circles...unless it has been and I have missed it. Looking around at articles, it is a very nasty thing.....how the F did it get on the market...the worlds gone mad.

    Mind you Thalidomide was safe wasn't it...not.

    I would suggest that peeps get into the country and find horse stables etc to get their manure from, if you must use it.
     
  6. JWK

    JWK Gardener Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    32,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +50,461
    tweaky: as far as i know it hasn't been taken up by anyone at a high level yet. A very few of us are jumping up and down trying to make a fuss but to no avail yet. The Pesticides Safety Directorate is the government agency responsible for licencing this stuff. They are part of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). They control the use of pesticides in: agricultural, horticultural, forestry, the home and garden. They tell me "Our powers relate to the regulation of pesticide approvals and to the use of a pesticide according to its approval and do not cover the subsequent use of treated material such as the aminopyralid-treated grass" The buck does not seem to get passed on to anyone else, so currently no govt agency is bothered if us home growers lose our veg patches.

    From the sales literature you can see this is a very attractive weedkiller for certain situations, as far as I know there is nothing else on the market like it (but haven't we managed OK up to now without it?).

    The Real Problems
    The weedkiller manufacturer (Dow AgroSciences Ltd) provide a warning that Forefront (aminopyralid) must not be used on food crops. I think the main problem is that the whole supply chain is too complicated to ensure this warning is communicated onwards. Dow AgroSciences Ltd sell Forefront via distributors, then a farmer or spraying contractor will apply the product, maybe another subcontractor will come and make the hay/silage, perhaps another hay/silage merchant will collect and store the grass product. This grass product might be sold on the open market and transported by another contractor. The compost manufacturer then turns it into compost (or uses manure from animals fed on the grass product). Finally a vegetable grower gets it, how is he/she to know what is in the product? Iâ??m afraid this whole chain is too complex for the warnings to be passed on from on to another.

    The other real problem is the persistency of this chemical. The chemical strongly binds to plant tissue and does not breakdown until the plant tissues decompose. There is evidence to suggest this may take up to 2 years depending on the soil type. Dow have advised me not to replant until 2009.

    Following spraying on grassland it passes through a cowsâ?? digestive system, the cows digesting the plant material are effectively concentrating the chemical in their manure. This is what is causing the problem on many allotments who have been supplied with manure direct from the farm.

    My problem was caused by the compost manufacturer using contaminated hay products, they had never even heard of this weedkiller until I contacted them, and they make bagged products sold in garden centres nationwide!

    tweaky: getting stable manure may not be the answer as the stables are not always aware of the provenance of any hay, feed, bedding that may have been imported from another farm. If everything they use is produced on their farm under their control then it should be safe. I'm trying to produce most of my own compost in the future, but will still have to rely on bought in seed compost. I will only buy 'certified' compost next time, i.e. with the Soil Association logo or others similar, I''m also running some small tests to see how easy it is to grow 'indicator' plants in any suspect/new compost, but this may prove to be impractical in the spring.

    Forefront was launched three years ago and Britain was the first European country to use it. Last year, some professional potato growers lost crops after spreading manure (as reported in Farmers' Weekly). An emergency education campaign was launched, aimed at livestock farmers, vegetable growers and spraying and spreading contractors, but that did not solve the problem. This year more potato farmers have had crops ruined, so its not just us 'grow your own' brigade.

    I fear we will see much more of this problem next year, it's devastating because although some veg are visibly affected (toms, beans & pots) others seem OK, but we are warned not to eat any of the produce

    Sorry it's a bit of a long ramble but I've lost about 90% of my stuff this year (although most of it looks really healthy) :mad: :mad: :mad:
     
  7. Kristen

    Kristen Under gardener

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    17,534
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Suffolk, UK
    Ratings:
    +12,669
    Emotive subject of course, that said my personal opinions are:

    "how the F did it get on the market"

    I don't have a problem with it, the instructions are VERY clear about the measures that need to be put in place. Very few of these sort of chemicals are "nice" - Roundup is an exception, apart from Fish, but it would be wrong to use that as a working-average. Personally I would not like to living in the middle ages and, regrettable thought it is, the advancement of science which has made our comfortable lifestyle is going to have some setbacks, we just need to try to minimise and mitigate them as much as possible.

    " this is a very attractive weedkiller for certain situations"

    Absolutely. From the farmer's perspective it must be akin to a miracle.

    "haven't we managed OK up to now without it?"

    Sure, but we keep demanding more for less. Just to keep food, and agricultural costs, static right now would be great. A chemical which reduces labour, or allows easier stock management etc. is going to be snapped up. If we, collectively, don't like that then we need to have a step change to pay more for food and insist that the provenance is as we want it to be. And if you pursue that ideal [I don't personally have a problem with that goal, I'm just arguing the contra-case here] you are heading for yields reduce by say 50% quite possibly combined with costs that will double, which then leads to insufficient supply and all sorts of cause-and-effect scenarios. I have no problem with that either, but I DO think it is beyond the wit of Governments to think it through a) carefully and b) dispassionately.

    On balance I would prefer a route that tinkers with the current status quo, regardless of whether that is right or wrong, rather than makes drastic wholesale changes. By all means set a course, but steady-on-the-rudder suits me better than Jibe Ho!

    "Dow AgroSciences Ltd sell Forefront via distributors, then a farmer or spraying contractor will apply the product, maybe another subcontractor will come and make the hay/silage, perhaps another hay/silage merchant will collect and store the grass product"

    Notwithstanding which the [current] label is very clear on the responsibilities [I don't know whether the label used last year is the same, or had lesser obligations]. Assuming there has been no change the people who applied the herbicide and then passed on either Fodder or Manure products are just plain negligent and culpable. Of course if the label has changed then questions need to be asked about why these side effects were not known at the outset and whether Dow is liable - and if not then I come back to my advancement-of-science argument; we all rue-the-day but tighten up the process so that this particular scenario, and any others like it that the boffins can envisage, don't happen again - a bit like Thalidomide as raised earlier; until then drugs used during pregnancy carried no increased caution [to the best of my knowledge], but SINCE then great attention is paid to anything used during pregnancy because it is now realised that the growing foetus is significantly more at risk of environmental influences than a regular fully grown adult.

    "The other real problem is the persistency of this chemical"

    An antidote, or a test for efficacy [is that the right word?] would be good, wouldn't it? ;)

    "the cows digesting the plant material are effectively concentrating the chemical in their manure"

    I think you are slightly "leading-the-witness" here, but I agree with the rest of your explanation, based on the paper-research that I have done.

    "An emergency education campaign was launched, aimed at livestock farmers, vegetable growers and spraying and spreading contractors, but that did not solve the problem"

    Just to repeat something I have mentioned in another thread. I had dinner last weekend with a large arable farmer (several thousand acres). He knew nothing about this herbicide's problems. I regard him as well informed within the industry, and although its a sample size of one I found it disturbing that his Farmers Weekly, or whatever farming rag he reads, had not hit him from its front-page.

    JWK: I remain concerned that you are continuing to grow your crops in order to satisfy the "evidence" requimrents for you to make people more aware. My concern is that this is to the your detriment because your face a self-effacing loss, in my opinion, because the herbicide will inevitably be bound to the plant material you are growing thereby lengthening the time before your site is clear of the problem. I would urge you to quickly conclude whatever business you need to that requires you to retain crops on your land, and remove all plant material post-haste (what's are the council going to do with that? Do you get a HazChem symbol for it? :( ) so that you can start rotavating and neutralising the problem on your plot.

    I apologize for any overly-passionate views that I have stated, particularly if they upset or offend anyone.
     
  8. tweaky

    tweaky Gardener

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,991
    Ratings:
    +3
    :eek::D:thumb:
     
  9. JWK

    JWK Gardener Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    32,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +50,461
    kristen: thanks for taking the time to respond, I've no problem with any of the emotive stuff - its a subject that hits so many nerves. I don't see anything in what you say as offensive, in fact I'm pleased you take such an interest.

    Basically I agree with you about the advancement of science and not staying in the dark ages. The problem with this chemical is that there are no practical procedures to control it. Relying on word of mouth to pass on warnings is hardly a 21st century process, I think we could do much better than that to provide traceability. I can see the attraction of this chemical to the farming community but there must be a price to pay for ensuring that any grassland products are controlled, that price has to be borne by the users of the chemical. In other words I am saying that the price to the farmer needs to be higher to cover the cost of policing the product, this would be a good thing as it will encourage other chemical manufacturers to make less persitant chemicals that do the same job but don't need the tracability police.

    Re: the testing or antidote, there really doesn't seem to be any reliable tests available let alone an antidote. Because it is so powerful only a very small amount is needed to cause damage to susceptible plants.

    and another thing ;) the digestive effect of cows effectively concentrating the chemical has been suggested by others - it may be bunkum - I'd thought I'd slip it in as it sort of makes some sense.

    Re: your large arable farmer - well I bet I know an even bigger one than you, actually a whole family of them :) - Seriously I think it just goes to show that not everyone is aware - I know that some large compensation claims have been paid out and are in the offing again this year.

    kristen: I appreciate your concern over my plot - I have a not so cunning plan, which involves swapping soil from a pile left over from some extension work I'm doing. I usually change my greenhouse soil every year, so it will just a 'little' bit more work than usual.
     
  10. Kristen

    Kristen Under gardener

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    17,534
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Suffolk, UK
    Ratings:
    +12,669
    I agree wholeheartedly that there needs to be the right communication. Don't know the best way to achieve that,. but there are clearly several choices.

    I live in the farming community, and I'm not a litigious sort of person (I hate all the "sue somebody" mentality), but I do think in this case that some people should be held accountable, and that would send a signal that wakes up the rest of them (whilst the communication methods are being put in place). That may not be easy / possible for bags of compost, but for a Lottie buying manure from a farmer (even if they have bought in fodder) I expect it will be more obvious. I'm still assuming that the caveats currently on the product label were there a year ago ...

    On the concentrating effect of a cows stomach ... apart from rushing to the butcher to buy one to make my Roundup go further! ... the stuff is bound to plant material, it will be bound to the same plant material when it comes out, won't it? Which is why I struggled with the "concentrating" bit, but I'm no scientist

    My point about my local farmer friend was not that he farms a large area, but that I consider him very well informed within the farming community, and I was disappointed that the farming press etc. have not caused him to become aware of the problem. Sample size of one though, as I said.

    "I know that some large compensation claims have been paid out and are in the offing again this year"

    That's good to hear, wasn't aware of that.

    "so it will just a 'little' bit more work than usual"

    Sounds like a good excuse to play with a Digger and a Dumper truck to me!!
     
  11. JWK

    JWK Gardener Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    32,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +50,461
    What I think 'could' happen is that the cows digest/breakdown the plant material, effectively freeing the chemical. So for arguments sake 99% of the cows intake is veg matter plus 1% chemical - what comes out the other end is a 1% s**t plus 99% chemical - figures adjusted to suit my argument of course ;) Well you can sort of see what I'm getting at there I hope.


    Sounds like a good excuse to play with a Digger and a Dumper truck to me!!

    Damn, I've been sussed :)
     
  12. JWK

    JWK Gardener Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    32,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Surrey
    Ratings:
    +50,461
    Along those lines here is the response I've had from the Pesticides Safety Directorate identiying who to turn to for help:

    The disposal of farmyard manure is covered by agricultural waste regulations, which are administered by the Environment Agency. However, where manure is used on agricultural land, it is not treated as waste, and although allotments are not agricultural land, the manure is being used for a similar purpose, so this is something of a grey area. On the other hand, manure from commercial stables appears to be covered by waste management regulations, which are also administered by the Environment Agency, but, again, the supply of stable manure to allotments also appears to be something of a grey area.

    The supply of manure will probably be covered by contract law and the purchase of compost (and possibly manure as well) will be covered by consumer protection and trading standards legislation but this is not an area PSD has any expertise in so information should be sought from a suitable qualified person for information and advice on this subject - a useful starting point might be your local Trading Standards Department.


    Like you I'm not a litigious person also I'm not a fan of the legal profession and I think they would be the only ones to really benefit, but unless a few heads roll maybe no-one will sit up and take notice.
     
  13. Kristen

    Kristen Under gardener

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    17,534
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Suffolk, UK
    Ratings:
    +12,669
    That response from the P.S.D. reads just like the specification for a chocolate teapot :(
     
  14. tweaky

    tweaky Gardener

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,991
    Ratings:
    +3
    That response from the P.S.D reads like a load of contaminated manure.;)
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice