"The Great Global Warming Swindle"

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by Daisies, Mar 10, 2007.

  1. Daisies

    Daisies Total Gardener

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,335
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +2,686
    This feature length programme was aired on C4 on Thursday night. It made compelling viewing.

    It included input from the nine top scientists from NASA, the International Arctic Research Centre and Massachusetts Insitute of Technology (MIT). In it they provided evidence that CO2 levels follow global warming not the reverse and that by a factor of 800 years, so this current elevation of CO2 was actually the result of events that occurred in 13th century!

    Also that the temperature of the stratosphere, which should be more affected than the planet's surface, is still normal. That the warming is cyclical and finally, and most importantly, the warming that is currently occurring was most likely caused by a combination of sun spot activity and the earth's normal elliptical orbit and nothing actually happening on the planet's surface.

    The programme is being repeated on More4 at 10pm on Monday night (and 11pm om More4+1).

    I really urge all who have access to More4 to watch it and see what we've all been suckered into.
     
  2. shiney

    shiney President, Grumpy Old Men's Club Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    64,839
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired - Last Century!!!
    Location:
    Herts/Essex border. Zone 8b
    Ratings:
    +126,953
    I mentioned this on 'what price global warming' under the 'Non-gardening Discussion' section and added a link about it. I did not see the programme.

    I admit that, at the moment, I am sitting on the fence. Having known quite a few television producers I have almost as little faith in them as in politicians when it comes to trying to put a balanced view across. Politicians want votes and producers want viewers. How they go about it is always suspect as far as I'm concerned.

    Nevertheless, I am keeping an open mind about it (though it may not seem like it). There is no doubt that the weather is changing from what we are used to, and whether carbon dioxide is the cause or the effect doesn't change what we are getting at the moment. If it is the effect then does our high production of carbon dioxide exacerbate the situation?

    -------------
    shiney
     
  3. wiseowl

    wiseowl Admin Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    45,222
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Philosophy of people
    Location:
    Flying Free As A Bird over North Kent Marshes
    Ratings:
    +92,982
    Well Its no good me sitting on the fence,there might be a moggy about.My personal view has always remained constant In that Global Warming
    Is a natural occurrence Primarily caused by the activity of the suns gasses.My oppinion as an amateur who has a keen interest in this topic
    is based on researching as much as I am able to and studying results from Ie The Net,books,Tv programmes,DVDs,Radio ect .Of course I cannot prove
    my theory and that is all it is. even the worlds scientists cannot agree or indeed prove the real cause of Global Warming.
    Everyone is entitled to their view and this is mine.
    [​IMG]
     
  4. pete

    pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    52,581
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Mid Kent
    Ratings:
    +98,697
    Sounds about right to me MD.
    I dont believe a single word about "Global Warming", it stand to sence that nothing we have all done recently is the cause, it has to be a long term effect.
    Man is so wrapped up in his own importance, he now thinks he, is responsible/can control, the climate.

    Anyway, it does give Gordon Brown chance to raise more money, so it must be a good idea. :D
     
  5. compostee

    compostee Gardener

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    446
    Ratings:
    +0
    I saw the program. I was a non believer in global warming. I remember the 70's Ice age. I felt safe, coz northern cities were going to be gripped in ice every winter. and I lived south of watford gap. sorry folks nth of the gap, but i was young and gullible. But not anymore. No wools being pulled over my eyes.
    I've known for some time that global warming is just a longer name for EVEN MORE TAX.
     
  6. jjordie

    jjordie ex-mod

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    3,639
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Norfolk
    Ratings:
    +206
    I've never believed in global warming and yes, like you Pete I have always thought climate change has to be due to long term effect. Of course while the government can grab a lot more tax because of it then they will keep on plugging it, and Tony Blair prancing around at various meetings because he has got so many to agree to his views - well there's nothing I can say that is printable!

    The next thing that will be a good idea for gathering MORE tax is to save us from this asteroid that is going to wipe us all out when it crashes into earth in about 30 years. If this is going to happen then why are they bothered about global warming :eek:
     
  7. pete

    pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    52,581
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Mid Kent
    Ratings:
    +98,697
    Very good point jjordie. [​IMG]
     
  8. Daisies

    Daisies Total Gardener

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,335
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +2,686
    A few more points that were made in the programme

    CO2 content - the biggest producer of CO2 is volcanoes. All the world's human population, industry and transportation combined, produces a tiny fraction of the amount of CO2 produced by the volcanoes on earth. Second on the list is the decaying of vegetation! (Natural composting!!!)

    The rainforests, it has always been claimed, are the natural 'lungs' of the world and our chopping them down is a direct causation of GW - not so, apparently the oceans are more important and the temp of the oceans is relevant because warmer oceans give off CO2 and cooler oceans absorb it.

    Therefore, CO2 levels have an 800 year lag behind global warming because the oceans are so huge, it takes them that long to warm up enough to make the difference.

    Therefore, the industrial age can have had nothing to do with all this because the initiation of the current warming was around the 13th century which was the last recorded incidence of sunspot activity!

    Watch the programme!
     
  9. shiney

    shiney President, Grumpy Old Men's Club Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    64,839
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired - Last Century!!!
    Location:
    Herts/Essex border. Zone 8b
    Ratings:
    +126,953
    I think they should bring out a law that says we can't eat baked beans and similar foods. That should cut down the production of gasses. [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    ---------------
    shiney
     
  10. Fran

    Fran Gardener

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,338
    Ratings:
    +3
    I'm going to be out of synch on this. I did not watch the programme, but heard the OU response to some of the points made in it.

    For instance, sunspot activity is a part of the modelling that is demonstrating global warming, as is volcanic activity. That one of the tipping points of global warming is the oceans warming and releasing CO2 - and that is already happening.

    One of the points he made, linked into the science on global dimming. i.e. that up until the twenty years or so, we have been protected from the rise in temperature, by the pollutants we were pumping out, in particular sulphur. Now we are cleaning up our act, the temperature rise is becoming clearer.

    Whether we are contribuing or causing climate change I think there is very little doubt that it is happening. For the UK - unless the gulf stream disappears (its already 30% less), not so very serious, but globally very serious.

    As I recall, it was not so many weeks ago that there was an international report subscribed to by most climate scientists, that we are the cause

    Check out http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/climateexperiment/

    [ 11. March 2007, 11:21 PM: Message edited by: Fran ]
     
  11. Daisies

    Daisies Total Gardener

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,335
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +2,686
    [​IMG]
     
  12. elainefiz

    elainefiz Gardener

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,724
    Ratings:
    +1
    I watched a documentary today,with Sir david Attenborough(i think thats how you spell it)"Can we save planet Earth?" and it scared the living daylights out of me.I think if this man says if we keep on the way we`re going,eg`s.the carbon dioxide we pump into the air,10 tons, per car,per yr,the wasted electricity,standby buttons,of which accounts for 10% of what we use,has already caused the ice to melt and so speed up the knock on effect,and by the way we cannot do a thing about this for the next 25 yrs,the oceons levels in the future, could rise up to 7 meters.....well,i for one believe him.
     
  13. Fran

    Fran Gardener

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,338
    Ratings:
    +3
    What frightens me more, is that if we can affect or slow down the predicted climate change, the window of opportunity is very small. 10-15 years. After that it becomes irreversible as various tipping points kick in. From the sea releasing CO2 to the natural destruction (already starting)of the amazon rain forest. Global action in that time period - I don't think so. What a legacy for our kids - we had the opportunity, and didn't take it. Mind isn't it so much easier to believe that we can have no effect.

    And if you want a real catch 22 situation, take the time to read this transcipt.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/dimming_trans.shtml
     
  14. Daisies

    Daisies Total Gardener

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,335
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +2,686
    That was the point of the programme - those scientist were equally convinced that what we are experiencing is normal for this planet and will eventually swing back to the other extreme. They say that the global warming issue has been pumped out of all proportion by the West to control other areas like forbidding Africa to use the coal and oil it has, in effect, telling the impoverished Africans that they can't have electricity.

    Watch the programme.
     
  15. walnut

    walnut Gardener

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,814
    Ratings:
    +15
    jjordie on your point about asteroids at about 1.00am on 11th march an asteroid 10m in dia missed us by 0.5 lunar distance and one 5m in dia is due to miss us by 0.7 lunar distance on the 13th so don't worry mate i'm keeping tabs on them for you :cool:
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice