Brexit -am I stupid or what

Hmm. I was browsing You Tube today and came across an interview by the BBC Hard Talk with Lady Hale. President of the Supreme Court. She solved puzzle I had. Previously I had related a court case I'd had as a traffic cop. The accused was found guilty of speeding and fined. He shouted that he would appeal to the Supreme Court. I'd never heard of such a court. The reason turns out to be. Back in the 1960's there was no Supreme Court. The Supreme Court as such only came into being ten years ago. Prior to that cases that warranted extra special consideration were dealt with by the House of Lords. Now I wonder if the individual in question, was someone to do with the government of the day?

 

Yet rarely has it been proven to be true so many times as it has been against Boris. Even Laura Kuenssberg was able to use the "truth......tenuous" phrase without complaint (yup! I stole it from her!).
He is also without principle. In a commons exchange with Emily Thornberry he categorically stated that there can be no return to a hard border whilst we were in the midst of the backstop issue.................
"there can be no return to a hard border. There can be no hard border. That would be unthinkable, and it would be economic and political madness. I think everybody, on both sides of this House, understands the social, political and spiritual ramifications of allowing any such thing to happen"

When he was asked which side he would back after the referendum was announced he said "I don't know. I will have to consider it first". This despite the fact that just a few weeks earlier he had written a piece for his Telegraph column about the importance of being in the EU for this country, which was rejected as it did not fit in with the editorial viewpoint, and so wrote a different column instead. His statement was claptrap - he is a tory and tories have obsessed about Europe for decades.

 

They , (the remain MPs and their mouthpieces, the media) , do really seem to be doing the demolition job on Boris now, I really cant believe that they have dragged up the fact he touched a woman's leg 20 yrs ago.

Horror of horrors, just wonder why its taken 20yrs to come out, and it surfaces at a time like this, so very unfortunate.

OH for god sake, shut up you "bunch of morons", (those that come up with this twaddle), and get on with the job in hand, one bloody way or the other.

 

I think we should demand another referendum, oops, sorry. I meant General Election. Then we can take back control from the cretins.

 

Personally I dont think either would solve anything, ................




.............because the results could easily be ignored if they got the wrong answer.

 

Which has already happened.

 

Hear Hear. Isn'this taking things a bit too far.

I honestly hate to see the way women are so often treated. In this context. How often perhaps, having been a guest at a friends home, and sitting around. You might lay your hand on the lady's thigh and say. Jane. Thank you so much. I have enjoyed a wonderful meal and fab company. Thank you so very much. Please permit me to return the compliment.

Now for either man or woman to place their hands on the genitals of another. Then that constitutes,'groping'. Passiung another so cloes and twitchin etc their genitalia. That's 'groping.

 

Please - I expect better of you than that! Both sides have lost standards but the leave side have easily descended further. The recent efforts to stop a no deal have relied (in a large part) on the governments own documents (for Operation Yellowhammer) whilst the government (or should I now call it a money making exercise for a chosen few) has called it a load of ballcocls and lied repeatedly about their efforts to persue a deal. So please, let's remain objective.

 

That is eaxactly what the government is suggesting. And once again, as I have said previously, this means that an open border for people remains between the UK and the EU. One of the (if not the main) points of the leave campaign was to put a stop to the immigration "free for all" yet once again they do nothing to address it - is this really a serious proposal or is it just more posturing from Boris.