You two are probably still there so I'll be along soon . John, you owe me a few drinks for your comment
Only just found this thread and haven't read all of it. The question I want answered is why in the LOGOC planning documents (2005-8) they estimated that they would want 8,500 security personnel, they then awarded a contract to G4S for 2,000 personnel in 2010 (giving them 2 years to do the work) and then only in December 2011 upped the contract to 10,000 - not only far exceeding the original estimate but simple maths saying that G4S were expected to find 4 times as many staff in the last 8 months as they'd originally been asked to find in 2 years. With even a CRB check taking 12 weeks, how could they possibly have fulfilled the contract so why was it offered and why was it accepted? I also suspect the use of army and police was actually planned all along although I would like to be proved wrong. I'm not really a fan of conspiracy theories and would love to think I lived in a country where I could believe what I was told. Did someone mention transparency???
my early post #6 still stands for me,sadly Did someone mention transparency??? Not heard that word spoken with any sincerity in high places for a long , long time Westwales
Shiney must be still breathing, JWK, he's just blown on the froth of his pint....the price of which is on your slate.
Naw, can't do that. I'm exhausted from blowing on my pint. John, can I have them as two singles as I can't lift a double?