HD Pictures

:lollol:....doh!

Steve...

 

What ?

ok Steve,i've deleted it from your site.

 

Wow! Gorgeous picture,you can almost touch the corn it is so... so... rustling and whispering out of the page, as if it was just there.

 

I thought you meant it was already on my site and that I must have missed it when you posted it here...hence the "doh" on my part. But you posted it after that so I could see it - thanks for that.

I'm not sure why you deleted it, you should have left it there as I had voted for it..

Steve...

 

:thumb:Got a vote from me as well:thumb:

 

Oh rite,
thought you wanted a larger version on here.
I wasn't going to do that as I dont trust the likes of tiny pic or photobucket too much.

Glad you like it.:thumb:
Maybe you lot should try half hdr,half normal images yourself.
Shea.

 

That's a great shot Shea.:gnthb:

 

HDR and B & W

 

One from our trip out yesterday

 

Very nice indeed Robert. :gnthb:The HDR treatment seems to have added depth to the scene. Looks like a nice spot!

 

They look great Caps well done.:gnthb:

 

What a beautiful photograph.

I must admit I have a thing about fields of wheat and reeds and anything which grows tall and waves in the wind. The detail in the foreground is immaculate. Thank you.

 

Capney - I'm interested in this technique but know nowt about it - but it is great to see your examples - I love the B&W train - but I notice in your landscape that the top of the tree has fallen victim to a loss of definition - is there any way around this? I have such problems when I try to isolate sky which has small intricate detail superimposed on the horizon in photoshop.

 

Thanks for the link. Free Open Source Software is a wonderful world, the only trouble is that there is no indexing to find what you want without searching, which is a problem if you don't know what the software is called. Following your link I found that it is "gtpfsgui", I then looked it up in "Synaptic Package Manager" and installed it (I use Ubuntu/Linux).

Edit: I had a dabble with it but so far I am not too keen, the foreground, middle distance and far distance seem to have sharpened and saturated more. The problem I have found is that the near distance which is long grass is that it now appears like a mist has settled over the grass and destroyed all detail. I tried to achieve the same result with The Gimp, got reasonably close to it with the advantage that the near distance retained the detail. I think I'll stay with The Gimp.

 

Down in the woods today.
[align=center][/align]