NEW CAR TAX METHOD

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by ARMANDII, Dec 7, 2013.

  1. clueless1

    clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Messages:
    17,778
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Here
    Ratings:
    +19,597
    The 'new electronic system' is just what they've had for years. Its easy to forge a tax disc. A cheap, widely available printer will do it these days. Coppers know this and don't rely on the presence of a tax disc. The patrol cars all have ANPR built in, and it beeps at the driver if it picks up a reg plate that doesn't link up to a valid tax record, insurance and MOT etc or if the car has been reported stolen. That's been the case for years.

    The only thing that changes in practical terms is that you'll no longer have to display a piece of paper in your windscreen.

    I believe they said that in the short term, you'll still be able to use the post office if you can't do it online, but also they have the awful automated telephone system.
     
  2. ARMANDII

    ARMANDII Low Flying Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2019
    Messages:
    48,096
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +100,844

    The problem with that is it wouldn't be just the Domestic User's rate of Road Tax that would be added to the cost of fuel but the Business User's rates as well with all the attached additional Green Taxes that are with them. So the likes of you and I would have to pay the additional cost of that as there is no point in having to invent a new system of differentiating from Business and Domestic which would have to be done at the point of sale thereby creating even more paperwork and cost.:dunno::snork:
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Fat Controller

      Fat Controller 'Cuddly' Scottish Admin! Staff Member

      Joined:
      May 5, 2012
      Messages:
      27,747
      Gender:
      Male
      Occupation:
      Public Transport
      Location:
      At me 'puter, GCHQ Ashford Office, Middlesex
      Ratings:
      +52,166
      If I remember correctly, the idea behind the fuel duty escalator was to apply increased duty to fuel in a phased manner, to then do away with VED as an individual payment.

      This of course was to ensure that the highest users paid the most tax, so it was proportionally fair.

      Trouble is, like so many other things, the governments got used having the money both ways, and knowing that we had no choice but to pay, simply never did away with VED

      Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
       
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • clueless1

        clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

        Joined:
        Jan 8, 2008
        Messages:
        17,778
        Gender:
        Male
        Location:
        Here
        Ratings:
        +19,597
        It wouldn't be really though. It would mean that the likes of me, who use a lot of fuel just to get to and from work, would be penalised for being willing to take a job that's not right on their doorstep.

        If fuel cost much more than it does, it would mean I'd be stuffed. With my current car it wouldn't be worth me going to work, but I couldn't afford to change my car for a more fuel efficient one because I'd either not be working (because I couldn't afford to get there) and so not bringing any money in to buy a different car, or spending all my money on fuel, in which case I couldn't afford to buy another car. The only viable option then would be for me to just go on the old king cole, which means I wouldn't be able to pay my mortgage, so I'd lose my house.

        It would be fair if the government introduced some sort of rebate for when the car is being used for commuting, but that would be an administrative nightmare for the government (who lets face it, just can't manage even the most simple things), so it wouldn't happen.

        Now what they could do, is employ someone like me, ie your average software developer, to build a system that adjusts your tax code, within bands, depending on how far from home your job is. Then they could charge everybody the same rate of fuel duty, thus keeping it simple, but you get it back in the form a reduction on your income tax.

        As it stands, we pay tax on our income, tax on the fuel we use to enable us to earn that income, tax again for the privilege of simply owning the vehicle that enables us to get to work, tax again on the mandatory insurance we have, and in the case of the fuel, the double whammy of also paying VAT as well as fuel duty.
         
        • Agree Agree x 2
        • pete

          pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

          Joined:
          Jan 9, 2005
          Messages:
          51,063
          Gender:
          Male
          Occupation:
          Retired
          Location:
          Mid Kent
          Ratings:
          +93,809
          Wouldn't work, full stop.
          Some of us actually use ours cars for recreation;)
          And we even change jobs
           
          • Like Like x 1
          • Agree Agree x 1
          • Fat Controller

            Fat Controller 'Cuddly' Scottish Admin! Staff Member

            Joined:
            May 5, 2012
            Messages:
            27,747
            Gender:
            Male
            Occupation:
            Public Transport
            Location:
            At me 'puter, GCHQ Ashford Office, Middlesex
            Ratings:
            +52,166
            I'm not saying for a second they were right @clueless1 - but all those years ago when the fuel duty escalator was born that was the theory behind it.

            In some respects, the theory held, as those who used more fuel would be using the roads more, and therefore would be paying more through their fuel usage toward the upkeep of the roads.

            The thing is, it went WAY too far, and motorists became cash-cows that the governments could not do without, so we ended up paying tax of around 80% (applied rate) and still forking out for a tax disc.

            As far as I am concerned, one of the biggest problems in this society is that none of us have a real clue as to how much we are paying in various taxes. In some respects, its a shame that we are not completely cashless, as that would potentially make it feasible to track all payments made in a week/month/year and with a breakdown of the actual cost and then the tax involved.

            Think about it, a gross (monthly) salary of £2000 - straight away, approximately £540 of that is gone in Income Tax and National Insurance. That leaves a net sum of £1460.

            From that, you put £150 in your petrol tank; tax component roughly £65. Balance £1310

            Gas and Electric - £150 for the month, tax component roughly £10, Balance £1260

            So before you have bought a thing, you have handed over £600+ in the month.
             
          • ARMANDII

            ARMANDII Low Flying Administrator Staff Member

            Joined:
            Jan 12, 2019
            Messages:
            48,096
            Gender:
            Male
            Ratings:
            +100,844
            I think what annoys me is that there isn't just one tax on fuel but several with the Fuel Escalator thrown in at the end which raises the rate of all the taxes on the fuel when used which magnifies the rise. Yet again, almost like the Green Taxes on the Energy Bills, it's the Chancellor's hand in your pocket that the main burden in the cost of your trip to the shops or work.
            I said "partly" regarding the Green Taxes on Energy Bills because although the Energy Companies would like you to be distracted by their campaign about the Green Taxes they are also the villains in the way they rig the tariffs and increases in costs, but that's another Thread!!
             
          • pete

            pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

            Joined:
            Jan 9, 2005
            Messages:
            51,063
            Gender:
            Male
            Occupation:
            Retired
            Location:
            Mid Kent
            Ratings:
            +93,809
            Personally I think it all went wrong when road tax was based on emissions, my next door neighbour pays nothing for his Fiesta.
            I pay £475 for my mondeo.
            I wouldn't mind paying a bit more than him, but that is ridiculous.

            Say we all bought what he is driving?

            What would happen then?
             
          • JazzSi

            JazzSi Super Gardener

            Joined:
            Jun 2, 2013
            Messages:
            786
            Ratings:
            +2,239
            • Like Like x 1
            • pete

              pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

              Joined:
              Jan 9, 2005
              Messages:
              51,063
              Gender:
              Male
              Occupation:
              Retired
              Location:
              Mid Kent
              Ratings:
              +93,809
            • clueless1

              clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

              Joined:
              Jan 8, 2008
              Messages:
              17,778
              Gender:
              Male
              Location:
              Here
              Ratings:
              +19,597
              I use my car for recreation too. It would work, because you'd only get a rebate based on a fixed travel allowance coming off your income tax. I do about 300 miles a week just travelling to and from work. Lets say there were bandings, <100 miles per week, 100-200, 200-300, 300+. Lets say then that 20p per mile, based on the lower figure in the band that you fall into, gets added to your tax free allowance.

              So for me, I'd be in the 200-300 miles per week band, so they treat it as 200 miles per week. Multiply by 48 (the number of weeks in a year minus the mandatory holiday allowance), gives 9600 miles that you can claim back at 20p per mile. That means that on top of my tax free allowance of whatever it is (about £10k I think), there'd be another £1920 on my tax free allowance.

              That means I'd be more able to afford to get to work. But if I then go on to clock up more miles for leisure, as I would and do, then it makes no difference to my tax break because no matter how much I use the car, I'm in the same commuting mileage band.

              It doesn't matter if you change jobs, because revenue and customs knows all about your work anyway because its tracked when your P45 changes hands, and quite often they re-check your tax code every time you change jobs anyway. They know where you live and where you work, so its easy enough to work out the mileage band.

              It falls down when the job itself is a driving job, but then I guess with a small amount of uncomplicated software development (and the only reason software projects fail for governments is because of all the red tape they put in themselves), would soon sort that.
               
            • ARMANDII

              ARMANDII Low Flying Administrator Staff Member

              Joined:
              Jan 12, 2019
              Messages:
              48,096
              Gender:
              Male
              Ratings:
              +100,844
              You're being optimistic there, FC, as the current rate of tax[es] on fuel is around 74% so the tax component is roughly £110/111 of the £150:dunno::snork:
               
            • pete

              pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

              Joined:
              Jan 9, 2005
              Messages:
              51,063
              Gender:
              Male
              Occupation:
              Retired
              Location:
              Mid Kent
              Ratings:
              +93,809
              Toooo many people tooo many variants, it wouldn't work, especially if you worked at different sites at different days,or travelled from one job to another during one day.
              You would need to inform the revenue of your every move via car.

              It needs simplifying not making more complicated.
               
              • Agree Agree x 1
              • clueless1

                clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

                Joined:
                Jan 8, 2008
                Messages:
                17,778
                Gender:
                Male
                Location:
                Here
                Ratings:
                +19,597
                No, you'd just need to tell revenue what your typical annual work mileage was, and there'd have to be an element of trust. Exactly as is currently the case when they don't question tax offsets for reasonable mileage expenses when you actually get sent somewhere that is not your normal place of work.
                 
                • Agree Agree x 1
                • ARMANDII

                  ARMANDII Low Flying Administrator Staff Member

                  Joined:
                  Jan 12, 2019
                  Messages:
                  48,096
                  Gender:
                  Male
                  Ratings:
                  +100,844
                  I've just thought that if we had no tax on fuel it would cost for diesel around my area [£1.39p a litre} it would cost me the grand sum of 32p a litre:hate-shocked::wallbanging::gaah:
                   
                  • Agree Agree x 1
                  • Funny Funny x 1
                  Loading...

                  Share This Page

                  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
                    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
                    Dismiss Notice