petition for water recycling

Discussion in 'Compost, Fertilisers & Recycling' started by PercyT, Feb 10, 2007.

  1. shiney

    shiney President, Grumpy Old Men's Club Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    63,872
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired - Last Century!!!
    Location:
    Herts/Essex border. Zone 8b
    Ratings:
    +124,740
    I have no technical knowledge re water collection and storage but still have a totally un-informed view on the matter.

    As mentioned in this topic, when it rains heavily (or not so heavily but when the ground is already saturated) the water runs off into streams and rivers and is lost out to sea - causing flooding as it goes.

    It would seem logical to have all the rainwater that hits our roofs going into the water authorities' drainage pipes which eventually return the water to reservoirs and storage facilities.

    We are not allowed to do this because the authorities say that the drainage systems can't take the extra flow. Of course it wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that it would cost them more money to run that extra volume through their sewage plants, would it? [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Similarly, the run-off from roads, pavements airport runways etc could eventually end up in water storage facilities if the water authorities would get their fingers out and make a concerted effort to improve their systems. If they started this they would be able to fix the leaks properly whilst they do it.

    End of rant!!! :D :D :D

    --------------
    shiney
     
  2. Hyla arborea

    Hyla arborea Gardener

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    333
    Ratings:
    +1
    Not a rant, Shiney - you're not far wrong! The British Rainwater Harvesting Association (I think that's what they're called) calculates that if you have a water meter you can cut your bills by 50% by collecting rainwater which is filtered and piped into your house for uses where drinking-quality water isn't needed. It also holds back rainfall which helps to stop flooding.

    Only trouble is, one of their systems, they say, costs around �£2,000. Takes a long time to recoup the cost. Why don't governments make it worth our while? (And sell solar panels cheaper, too!)

    Google them - their website is pretty interesting.

    Still, B & Q announced today that water butt sales are booming. There's hope for us yet!!!
     
  3. pete

    pete Growing a bit of this and a bit of that....

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    51,555
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Mid Kent
    Ratings:
    +95,455
    Its just a thought but on a hot summer day I can use two water butts full of water just to water my pots, the amout of water that I can collect and save is virtually useless.
    What I would really need is an underground tank of about a thousand gallons to actually make much difference to the amount of tap water I use.
     
  4. shiney

    shiney President, Grumpy Old Men's Club Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    63,872
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired - Last Century!!!
    Location:
    Herts/Essex border. Zone 8b
    Ratings:
    +124,740
    Quite right pete, when the government were trying to get us to use water butts I emailed them and said that it was just a diversion from the real point of water storage and consevation. I also pointed out to them that as we were in a drought (and a heatwave) we weren't going to get any rain to fill the water butts. The water needs to be stored when it rains in the winter.

    Needless to say, they said the control of water is up to the water authorities. :mad: :mad:

    -------------
    shiney
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice