same sex marriage?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by Allan Hodgson, Mar 29, 2014.

  1. Phil A

    Phil A Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Buggered if I know :dunno:
     
    • Funny Funny x 5
    • Creative Creative x 1
    • Madahhlia

      Madahhlia Total Gardener

      Joined:
      Mar 19, 2007
      Messages:
      3,678
      Gender:
      Female
      Location:
      Suburban paradise
      Ratings:
      +3,090
      How come buggery gets through the swear filter tonight?
      What is it with blokes and lesbians?Please don't explain.

      I would be quite happy watching two fit blokes getting friendly on the dance floor, but for some reason that's Not Allowed.
       
      • Funny Funny x 2
      • Like Like x 1
      • clueless1

        clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

        Joined:
        Jan 8, 2008
        Messages:
        17,778
        Gender:
        Male
        Location:
        Here
        Ratings:
        +19,597
        Well, I can speak for anyone else, but I didn't find it a turn on or anything like that, I just found it incredibly entertaining. I guess partly for the novelty, and partly because of their apparent bravery because they must have realised they were drawing attention to themselves, and partly out of curiosity to see how far they'd get before realising what they were doing. It got as far as items of clothing being hastily removed.
         
      • pamsdish

        pamsdish Total Gardener

        Joined:
        Apr 5, 2008
        Messages:
        5,151
        Gender:
        Female
        Occupation:
        Retired
        Location:
        "Black Country Wench" in Margam,Port Talbot,Wales
        Ratings:
        +4,445
        Been there, done that, seen the movie, got the t-shirt.
        I have kept out of this previously been following with interest.
        [​IMG]
         
        • Like Like x 9
        • longk

          longk Total Gardener

          Joined:
          Nov 24, 2011
          Messages:
          11,387
          Location:
          Oxfordshire
          Ratings:
          +23,104
          @pamsdish - those cupcakes are stunning! If that much attention was paid to such a small detail the the rest of the day must have been spectacular.
           
          • Agree Agree x 5
          • Phil A

            Phil A Guest

            Ratings:
            +0
            It's not on the list :)
             
          • shiney

            shiney President, Grumpy Old Men's Club Staff Member

            Joined:
            Jul 3, 2006
            Messages:
            63,559
            Gender:
            Male
            Occupation:
            Retired - Last Century!!!
            Location:
            Herts/Essex border. Zone 8b
            Ratings:
            +123,964
            Well said :goodpost:

            Why do most heterosexuals think that male gay partnerships must include anal intercourse (I find the other word crude but not offensive - although the intent of the use of the word is offensive)?

            Not being gay I have no first hand knowledge, but I have it on good authority (having known many gay men) that it is in the minority in gay partnerships.

            I, also, don't know of the prevalence in heterosexual partnerships. For all we know it may be less common in gay partnerships than in heterosexual ones!!

            Making unfounded assumptions of peoples' proclivities is a fault within society. I prefer to give the benefit of the doubt until I have evidence to negate it.
             
          • shiney

            shiney President, Grumpy Old Men's Club Staff Member

            Joined:
            Jul 3, 2006
            Messages:
            63,559
            Gender:
            Male
            Occupation:
            Retired - Last Century!!!
            Location:
            Herts/Essex border. Zone 8b
            Ratings:
            +123,964
            Paul, although I agree with what, I think, you are trying to get across I think some of your arguments are not quite correct. :smile:


            This can't happen as the protagonists are letting sentiment, upbringing and emotion rule their argument.


            I don't think the government give a monkeys about what status people have when they create children. The status of the children is the important thing and that doesn't really rely on the status of the parents. It depends on how the government treat the situation from the financial point of view, and that is easily modified.


            Although I said I don't think the government could give a monkeys, they do care about how the electorate see perceive things. What? Moi, cynical! Never!!! :heehee:
            It's a matter of how the individual perceives the meaning of the word 'marriage' and that is the reason why there is a call for same sex marriages. It is perceived as a binding declaration of love - whilst a civil wedding is not seen that way. Of course, whether marriage is really such a declaration is an argument for another time.


            Not sure about the validity of that argument. Whether you agree or not with the first sentence (I'm not sure that I do), it is not relevant to the second sentence. It seems to be bringing into play the old question of 'how many word are there for snow'!
            It's very subjective whether they are distinctly different entities.
             
          • clueless1

            clueless1 member... yep, that's what I am:)

            Joined:
            Jan 8, 2008
            Messages:
            17,778
            Gender:
            Male
            Location:
            Here
            Ratings:
            +19,597
            What if a very elderly widow meets and develops affection for an equally elderly widower, so under know illusion that they each only have a short time left on this earth, they marry for companionship. Biology wont come into it as neither is capable any more the old 'hows your father', they just want to finish their time here with a bit of happiness that comes from being with somebody you like.

            So, taking sex out of the equation entirely, are this elderly couple still married in the strictest sense of the word? Most would say they are. The couple consists of a man and a woman. That's enough to satisfy most that their marriage is a proper marriage. But, what if it was two elderly men or two elderly women? Then its a same sex marriage which some people wont recognise or respect. But what is different?
             
          • Val..

            Val.. Confessed snail lover

            Joined:
            Aug 2, 2010
            Messages:
            6,355
            Gender:
            Female
            Occupation:
            Retired
            Location:
            Hay-on-Wye, Hereford
            Ratings:
            +4,951
            There is no difference, but I don't think people are bothered one way or the other with elderly couples. The 2 old women or 2 old men are unlikely to want to get married in church & certainly won't be adopting children so it really doesn't matter.

            I think it's highly likely that they do, they have no other way of 'formally' consummating the marriage. Personally I couldn't care less what their sex lives include, I just don't think these marriages should take place in church because then everyone would be happy, the gay people would be married and the religious folk could still keep their beliefs. :)

            Val
             
            • Like Like x 1
            • Lea

              Lea Super Gardener

              Joined:
              Feb 14, 2011
              Messages:
              914
              Gender:
              Female
              Location:
              Bucks
              Ratings:
              +1,067
              I am a little surprised that Fat Paul joined GC just to post on this thread. :scratch:
               
              • Agree Agree x 4
              • longk

                longk Total Gardener

                Joined:
                Nov 24, 2011
                Messages:
                11,387
                Location:
                Oxfordshire
                Ratings:
                +23,104
                Why? It has stirred up a lot of debate in society and some have very strong views about it.
                Disappointing maybe, but hey ho!
                 
                • Agree Agree x 1
                • Fat Controller

                  Fat Controller 'Cuddly' Scottish Admin! Staff Member

                  Joined:
                  May 5, 2012
                  Messages:
                  27,767
                  Gender:
                  Male
                  Occupation:
                  Public Transport
                  Location:
                  At me 'puter, GCHQ Ashford Office, Middlesex
                  Ratings:
                  +52,209
                  I agree, but I am firmly in the 'couldn't give a monkeys' camp. What two (or more) consenting adults do behind closed doors is entirely their business (as long as it is legal of course); I have no knowledge of the intricacies of a gay partnership, nor do I wish to have; but then, I do not have any knowledge of the intricacies of the heterosexual relationships of friends and family members - why should I, and again, I have no desire to.
                   
                  • Agree Agree x 2
                  • Like Like x 1
                  • Jack McHammocklashing

                    Jack McHammocklashing Sludgemariner

                    Joined:
                    May 29, 2011
                    Messages:
                    4,423
                    Gender:
                    Male
                    Occupation:
                    Ex Civil Serpent
                    Location:
                    Fife Scotland
                    Ratings:
                    +7,376
                    Most probably a long standing member who has an opinion, but does not want it associated with them due to its controversy
                    Especially so if you are of the opinion against, when everyone else declares it is perfectly normal

                    A civil partnership gave them every legal/financial right that they had previously asked for
                    Now they want Marriage That is just to wave it in other peoples faces
                    Next it will be the ECHR demanding the church do marriages for them and compensation for all their suffering in a civil partnership, with the Lesbians wanting VAT FREE turkey basters

                    Jack McHammocklashing
                     
                    • Agree Agree x 1
                    • Victoria

                      Victoria Lover of Exotic Flora

                      Joined:
                      Jun 9, 2006
                      Messages:
                      31,477
                      Occupation:
                      Lady of Leisure
                      Location:
                      Messines, Algarve
                      Ratings:
                      +56,261
                      I find this whole thread bizarre now .... :hate-shocked:
                       
                      • Agree Agree x 4
                      Loading...

                      Share This Page

                      1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
                        By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
                        Dismiss Notice